Marek Gengel vs Benjamin Hassan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Hassan and Gengel compare in second serve performance? Hassan has a slightly higher success rate of 45.8% compared to Gengel's 40.49%, suggesting more effective play from Hassan in this area.
• In terms of return games, Hassan leads in both second serve returns (48.23%) and first serve returns (27.66%) over Gengel's 45.51% and 24.13%, giving him a clear advantage in turning defense into attack.
• Under pressure, Hassan has been more successful in saving breakpoints, with a 53.85% save rate versus Gengel’s 48.35%, indicating stronger mental resilience in critical moments.
• Although Hassan's match win percentage in the last year is lower at 48.68% compared to Gengel's 69.77%, it suggests Gengel's consistency over a larger dataset of matches.
• Which player benefits more from their favored surface? Hassan excels on clay courts (61%), while Gengel's best performance is on hard courts (66%). Surface preference could influence match outcomes depending on where they play.
• Gengel has dominated lower-tier events with an 85% win rate on ITF circuits, whereas Hassan has faced tougher competition, demonstrated by his 46.43% win rate in more challenging tournaments.
• Head-to-head statistics show Hassan has a 1-0 edge, indicating psychological and strategic know-how when facing Gengel, although the previous victory was not decisive.
• In extra pressure scenarios such as tiebreaks, Gengel seems to have an edge, having won the only tiebreak they've played against each other, but Hassan is more tested against higher-ranked players.
• Both have similar efficiency in break point conversion around 40%, indicating a need for both players to be opportunistic when chances arise during play.

Editorial Prediction (September 2, 2025, UTC):

Reviewing recent performance trends, Hassan exhibits stronger second serve and return capabilities compared to Gengel, underlining his key advantage in maintaining a more competitive edge during rallies.

Despite Gengel's higher overall winning percentage over the last year, Hassan’s superior play in higher-tier competitions and previous head-to-head victory suggest he can leverage strategic and psychological edges over Gengel.

The upcoming match's outcome could hinge on surface conditions and mental fortitude. While Gengel excels in tiebreak situations, Hassan’s experience against stronger opposition gives him a slight edge.

Based on these analytics, Hassan appears slightly more favored to win the upcoming encounter, should he maintain his current form and capitalize on his opponent’s vulnerable serve and under pressure situations.